Top 5 Cities for NFL Expansion or Relocation

Updated: Oct 5, 2021

Photo: Clayton Freeman/The Florida Times-Union
Jacksonville general partner Wayne Weaver (Formerly of St. Louis) holds a Jaguars helmet following the NFL’s announcement that the Jacksonville Jaguars will be the league’s 30th team in Chicago.

The NFL announced it would be extending their season to 17 games per team this coming 2021 season. Season extension is the first step in NFL expansion since 2002 when the league went to 32 teams by adding the Houston Texans. The NFL adds approximately two teams every 15 years, and since the last franchise was added into the NFL in 2002, that would put the NFL by 2021 past due on adding any expansion teams by 19 years. By the time the NFL gets its act together, it can only be as early as 2025 before an expansion team could start playing games in the NFL.

Principal owner Jerry Richardson holding the new expansion Panther jersey

The NFL added the Carolina Panthers and the Jacksonville Jaguars during the 1993 expansion process. It took those two organizations two years to create everything needed to get a franchise up and running. Had they not already had most of the infrastructure in place, they wouldn't have gotten an expansion team in the first place. So let's play a little game, shall we? Let's play who gets the franchise!


Cities like London, Toronto, Mexico City will not be considered due to logistical issues, business conflict, and safety issues. It is not a fan support issue. It is my opinion on over 30 years of watching the NFL and its business practices.

The criteria for consideration is that the city in question has to be NFL ready or in the process of becoming prepared to host a team in the next five years.

So let's begin!

1. St. Louis

You knew this was coming.

I know I'm biased, but St. Louis deserves this spot, period.

St. Louis has already hosted two different NFL franchises with decent success regardless of the narrative that the Rams and the NFL put out that the fans didn't show up to games, which is just flat-out not true. With a metro area of nearly 3 million, not counting the surrounding market, it's a slam dunk that the fanbase is there to support a team. The city still has the existing Dome in downtown STL, and it is not as awful as the Rams and the NFL made it out to be. With a few million dollars in improvements, there is no reason that a team cannot play in the former ED Jones Dome, at least for the next few years, until a new facility can be built.

All their struggles to keep a franchise in the Gateway City are of no fault to the fans. After two horrible carpet-bagging owners in Bill Bidwill and Enos Stanley, Kroenke was more interested in lining their pockets and getting taxpayer-funded stadiums than trying to compete with a winning product on the field. The shining example of the St. Louis Cardinals and the St. Louis Blues organizations led by Bill DeWitt II and Tom Stillman has shown what it is to be a franchise owner in St. Louis, a steward if you will.

The fans of St. Louis will not tolerate a lame attempt to appease their vanity for the sake of having a franchise. Look to the XFL's short stint in the Gateway City as an example of how to engage a fanbase and get them to support your product. The St. Louis BattleHawks outsold every team in the XFL in merchandise bar a far amount. The fans out-attended the games by double of any other team. Before the XFL canceled the season, the game was to bring nearly 50,000 fans into the Dome for an XFL game.

There is no denying that St. Louis fans love football. The question is, what will the lawsuit that is against the Rams, and the other 31 teams in the NFL, do for the city in terms of a potential franchise? On October 25th, 2021, St. Louis shall see the NFL in court if it's not settled for a team by that point.

2. San Diego

Speaking of another city that was scorned by the NFL coming in at number 2 in San Diego. Another tale of the fans supporting a team for decades, even with a primarily average or subpar product to only get hosed when it came to the big money relocation saga of Los Angeles. The Chargers had called San Diego home for 56 years before they bounced to LA's giant money pastures, leaving a dedicated fanbase behind. The Chargers happily experienced fan attendance numbers of nearly 60,000 per year until their last year in SD, where it was shown that the team had little to no interest in staying in the market.

San Diego is constricted by the same issues as other California teams, whereas teams in the state NEVER receive public funds for their stadiums. The State is continually broke, and to be completely honest, the amount of revenue these teams make in the southern California TV market alone should suffice. Yet, we all know that the NFL isn't just about making money. They want to make obscene money.

3.5 million people reside in the city metro, so it has the fanbase to support another team or a Chargers' return (just without Dean Spanos) to the market because we all know that the Chargers aren't going over well LA LA Land.

San Diego has proven without a doubt that it can and has supported an NFL franchise for more than 50 years, so allowing them to have another franchise is a no-brainer. Let's not forget that San Diego is a southern California market sought after by the NFL for TV revenue. So the NFL has a sight set on San Diego for sure.

3. Oakland

It's funny that my top 3 cities on this list are cities that have lost their teams but, let's be clear, the NFL didn't want the Raiders to move from Oakland (Until Uncle Jerruh brokered the Vegas deal) or the Chargers to move from San Diego. The additional 100 million promised to those two markets if they could rally a viable plan to keep their teams was universally denied to St. Louis. Shall I add the memo? I shall!

As it has been so affectionately called over the years, the Black Hole has some of, if not the most rabid fanbase in the sport. The fans deserved better than what they got. They supported a lot of bad football over the years, and they were rewarded by their team moving. Oakland would be better suited for expansion rather than relocation.

There is no reason that Oakland shouldn't have a team. The only issue is that the financially strapped city will have to find a wealthy donor to bring football into the market. They need someone with deep pockets, not the penny pinchers that they've had in the past.

4. Salt Lake City